Monthly Archives: May 2007

Heroes – ‘The Hard Part’ Recap

Well, it’s not just a low-level single with a strange video from Coldplay’s X&Y anymore; it’s also the 21st ‘Heroes’ episode of the season. If you haven’t watched it yet, be warned: it’s nothing like last week. In fact, it only further proves why “Five Years Gone” (Or “String Theory”) was a mistake for the show; while it was an exhilirating hour, there was no way that this episode could live up to it. Last week was a terrible tease, not giving us the real climax, and now it yanks it all away with Sylar spending time with his mother, and a series of go-nowhere plots that failed to really advance in the process. It’s not this episode’s fault, it was actually not a bad filler episode for the series, but coming after last week’s action-packed episode it just pales in comparison.

For those who haven’t watched it, and perhaps wish to be spoiled, head to YouTube for the Canadian Preview for Next Week.

For those who haven’t the recap remains. Sure, it’s a bit slower than last week, but setup is an important step to any process, and the stage remains well set. What took place, and what exactly is the hardest part? Read on to find out.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Heroes, NBC, Television

The Superpower Bauer Hour Showdown: Special “HD” Edition

This is, indeed, a special edition of the Superpower Bauer Hour, one which annoys me to no end. You see, while the old Superpower Bauer Hour Showdown was designed to see which of the two shows was better in terms of quality and ratings, this is a different showdown. While I failed to bring the showdown back thanks to, well, my complete disinterest in 24, this evening presents a new kind of showdown: which of these two shows shall be watched in HD?

You see, Global (Canadian TV Network for those unaware) has been airing Heroes an hour earlier (8pm EST), as it has to air 24 as well. This has been great for Canadian fans who want to get their Heroes fix as soon as possible…at least I thought so until last Monday evening. When, at 9pm Atlantic Time, I turned to Global HD to find Heroes…

in Standard Definition.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under 24, Global, Heroes, NBC, Television

It’s Official: ‘Lost’ Ends in 2010

There’s been rumours over the past week regarding Lost’s future, and Variety has the breaking story this morning: Lost will end at some point during the 2009-2010 season.

Variety.com – ‘Lost’ set for three more years

It was a contingency to the continued involvement of Executive Producers Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, and has been foreseen for quite some time…and yet it comes with an interesting couple of twists that were not forecasted.

With the announcement comes a confirmed number of episodes remaining after the end of the third season: 48. This isn’t too surprising, and coincides with rumours earlier in the week…but what doesn’t coincide is the fact that these 48 episodes will be spread out over three seasons of 16-episodes. This won’t be too unfamiliar for fans of the series; we’re currently at the end of a 16-episode block, so each season will now basically be what we’ve experienced this Spring. Each season will run uninterrupted, and will likely fall in the Spring of each year, although this hasn’t been confirmed.

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under ABC, Lost, Television

TARnalysis: Why “A” Right Team, In The End, Won ‘The Amazing Race’

SPOILER WARNING: I shall be discussing the nerve-racking finale of The Amazing Race: All-Stars, which had me on the edge of my seat numerous times. Did Dustin and Kandice become the first all-female team to win the Race? Did Charla overcome the odds to become a race champion? Did Eric redeem himself from his tragic 2nd place finish two seasons ago? To find out why I think a (Not the) right team won the Amazing Race…

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Reality TV, Television, The Amazing Race

Today’s Sci-Fi TV: Why Entertainment Weekly Got it Right

Entertainment Weekly recently released, to much reaction across the Interweb, a list of the top 25 television or film examples of science fiction from the past quarter century. In terms of films, it has your usual suspects: Blade Runner (Which I must admit I haven’t actually watched, although I did recently read the Philip K. Dick novel upon which it was based), The Matrix, E.T., Aliens, Star Trek II, etc. And, of course, there’s the classic TV shows: Doctor Who, The X-Files, Quantum Leap. However, there are three current TV shows which made the list: Heroes (#18), Lost (#11), and Battlestar Galactica (#2). And, although I’m sure that some legions of fans may disagree, it is my opinion that this is the correct order for these three shows.

Heroes deserves to be on the list for being the most unabashedly science fiction-esque of the three series, and certainly moreso than anything else on television today. The world of superheroes, of comic book universes, is something that has remained mostly out of network television realm in recent years; you’d have to go back decades to find shows like Superman, Batman, the Green Lantern, etc. in order to find a time when these types of shows were on the airwaves. And, much as superheroes have changed over those years, so has their television shows. Heroes comes to the table with intriguing powers, apocalyptic futures, and a collection of characters which bend the normal rules of human logic to a wonderful degree. In essence, it’s science fiction television for a new generation.

However, the problem is that Heroes hasn’t yet had time to really establish itself, so it is incapable of placing higher on this list. While it certainly has proven a sensation in this its first season, I’ve talked at length in the past as to whether it can continue on this path to success. Also, although I don’t think this is necessarily a bad thing, I don’t think the show has proven itself capable of balancing normal television drama with its science fiction elements. Any good piece of science fiction needs to be able to both present abnormal themes and events and, when the time calls for it, create human drama that remains relevant and real to the viewer. For me personally, outside of Company Man (Dealing with the backstory of the pictured Mr. Bennet), Heroes had yet to do it. This is why, for now, Heroes must remain on the lower end of the Science Fiction hierarchy. The future, however, could prove more kind to the series.

Lost, which breaks into the top half of EW’s list, is one of the reasons why Heroes was able to be made. For the first time since The X-Files, ABC’s hit drama was a hit with audiences despite its subtle leaning into the realm of science fiction. And, really, it was the subtlety brought to the table by producers J.J. Abrams and Damon Lindelof in the first season that paved the way for the show’s success, and the greenlighting of numerous Sci-Fi pilots the following year. While it is a show at its core about human drama and the plight of these castaways, this mystical island on which they live is in itself one of those characters. It is always looming, whether it’s in tangible forms (Smoke Monster) or in more metaphorical ones (The recent Magic Box, its power over Locke in the first season, etc.) It is an omnipresent force upon the show, one which remains an integral part of its success.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Battlestar Galactica, Heroes, Lost, Television

Goldi”Lost” and the Three Scheduling Options

[For the unaware, there are currently rumours swirling around the scheduling options for Lost’s upcoming season. The current rumours, as covered in numerous locations, have Lost running from January to May, in an earlier times lot, as well as officially coming to a close sometime in 2009. This solved a few of the show’s scheduling issues in theory, but I figure we should take a trip down memory lane to see how it got to this point. However, this is a slightly different trip, so be warned as we take a magical journey into a mystical fairy tale land. Enjoy.]

Once upon a time, there was a television show named “Lost” which has spent three seasons traversing a series of obstacles on its way to being a Top 10 television program in the key demographics which advertisers crave. It faced off against a wolf trying to trick Lost into falling into its trap through disguise (Much like how viewers saw through blatant ripoffs like Invasion and Surface in 2005, Lost was not fooled), and our show narrowly escaped the evil grip of the witch who bakes TV shows in her oven (“I have success in the 18-34 Male Demo inside, come a little closer!”)

However, on its way, Lost found that it had come to an important crossroads, marked by a small little house where three scheduling options made their home. It was a humble abode, but one could feel that important decisions would be made for the show’s future.

Lost, feeling a bit disoriented with its current path, decided that he should stop by and pay them a visit. Unfortunately, they weren’t in, but had left a note that any guests were more than welcome (Lost would never enter someone’s house uninvited, that would be plain rude). So, Lost made itself at home, and saw that there were three bowls of porridge sitting upon the table. The note had also mentioned that they Lost was invited to taste test their porridge selection, so he figured that he should assist them in finding the right one. Perhaps, at the same time, it would find the right porridge for its own future.

Each porridge, Lost found, was context sensitive to its own situation! (Did I mention this was a magic house? No? Well, it clearly is). As a result, Lost first decided to try the porridge labeled “9pm Wednesdays, September to May with repeats throughout.” It takes a spoonful.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under ABC, Lost, Ratings, Television

Spider-Man 3: Box Office Predictions

Spider-Man 3 swings into the box office today…well, last night really, spreading a web of epic proportions with its over 4200 screens (An industry record). However, puns aside, how large will the film really be? The film doesn’t seem as necessary as Spider-Man 2 did, and the reviews are reflecting it: it’s sitting at a barely fresh 62% on Rotten Tomatoes (Compared to 90+ for Spidey 2), and is at 59 on Metacritic. While mediocre reviews certainly didn’t sink Jack Sparrow last summer, I don’t think that this sequel feels as urgent as even Dead Man’s Chest. Spider-Man has been a series that, while appealing to comic book fans, have also been widely respected as some of the best super hero films to date. And now, with that pedigree gone according to reviewers, will this film be unable to live up to its North American success?

My prediction?

Myles’ Spider-Man 3 Box Office Prediction

[Drumroll please…]

$134,427,814

Based on the international success thus far, the marketing steamroller has been effective enough to make for a big opening weekend tally. However, it should be known that my prediction has it falling short of Pirates 2’s opening weekend record. Still, it’s a huge opening that isn’t likely to be too dampened by the reviews. Any of the effects from those will be seen in the following weekends, especially when Shrek 3 opens in two week’s time.

What is everyone else predicting?

Box Office Guru – $140,000,000

Box Office Report – $145,000,000

Am I not giving it enough credit? Will fans turn out even without good reviews (They did go see X3, after all)? Is Venom enough of a draw to overcome the film’s problems? Only time will tell: specifically, mere hours from now when we get the results from the Midnight showings. I’ll update with that info when it comes in.

1 Comment

Filed under Box Office, Cinema

Everything You Want To Know About the Grey’s Anatomy Spinoff

While there was some stuff about Cristina’s wedding, and about Meredith and her father, let’s face it: we were watching tonight’s episode of Grey’s Anatomy, “The Other Side of This Life,” for a preview of Addison (Kate Walsh) and her spinoff (Tentatively titled ‘Private Practice’) which currently has a really good shot of making ABC’s lineup in the Fall (Although the Grey’s stuff got REALLY heavy at the end, I’m still choosing to ignore it). But, the thing is…is it any good? Is the show really worth a spot on ABC’s schedule? Let’s evaluate and find out.

The Premise

Addison takes a trip down to Santa Monica to visit some old med school friends who are running a doctor’s cooperative on the sunnier part of the West Coast. She arrives at Oceanside Wellness Group with one thing in mind: having a baby (which proves to be a difficult goal). The clinic is also currently lacking an OBGYN, after theirs had a little run-in with one of the partners, so there’s an empty office just asking for Addison to step in to fill the void.

The show basically operates like Grey’s Anatomy with a greater focus on different medical conditions. It’s got its procedural structure of cases of the week, in this case a surrogate situation gone wrong and a man with low sex drive. To what extent this would develop differently once picked can only be speculated upon. For now, it’s Grey’s Anatomy dealing with psychiatric cases and more OBGYN aspects.

The Characters

Any good spinoff, really, has to be able to create memorable characters that we’re willing to accept as part of the show’s universe. This means establishing archetypes that are different from what we see on the original series, and creating performances that are distinct and memorable. And, in my view, I’d say that this particular spinoff has done a fairly good job of this.

The Best FriendNaomi (Merrin Dungey)

Where you’ve seen her before: She played Francie on “Alias”.

She’s the friend for Addison, an old Med School buddy who is going through some problems on her own. She brings a nice parallel to the table in terms of Addison’s goal of having a child and her past relationship issues, and as the clinic’s fertility doctor she clearly factors directly into Addison’s plan to have a baby. On the whole, I’d say she’s a successful addition to the show’s universe, and she doesn’t come across as similar to any existing characters.

The Male Divorcee Struggling with SinglehoodSam (Taye Diggs)

Where you’ve seen him before: He played the titular character on UPN’s “Kevin Hill” and ABC’s “Daybreak”

On the surface, Jackson is a little bit like McDreamy, but in reality he’s more of the anti-McDreamy. Although he was recently divorced, he is certainly not reacting by sleeping with random interns; instead, he’s remaining single and owns a small little dog and working alongside his ex-wife (Naomi). He’s got a successful book (Dr. Feelgood is his other name, apparently), but you have the feeling that he could snap at any moment and just go wild. It’s a complex character, and it’s kind of interesting.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under ABC, Grey's Anatomy, Private Practice, Television

The End of Gilmore Girls: Series Finale May 15th

EDIT: Well, the show has come to a close: tonight, May 15th, Gilmore Girls ended. For a full review of the kind of great finale, click on the link – “Reviewing the Series Finale…” 

I’ve been holding out some hope in recent weeks that things were looking bright of the future of The CW’s Gilmore Girls. It was finally heading back towards its main story threads, Luke and Lorelai appeared to be back on track, and by all accounts the show was in much better shape. While there were rumours of this being the show’s last season, there was also talk of a shortened 13-episode season to close out the show’s storylines in a meaningful fashion. I, personally, took to calling this the show’s epilogue. And yet, with today’s news that Gilmore Girls has been cancelled, the show will be having its series finale on May 15th. And to be honest, I’m kind of pissed about it.

There are some good notes to this story: this is one more slot The CW needs to fill, and therefore one more slot which a revamped Veronica Mars could find itself in. However, that’s a bit of a stretch of a bright side, I’d say, considering that I’m oddly more concerned about Gilmore Girls. While I enjoy Veronica Mars, I feel more emotionally attached to the world Amy Sherman-Palladino created and abandoned at the end of last season.

I had resigned myself to the possibility of cancellation at the beginning of the season, which was admittedly a rough one. New producer David S. Rosenthal had a pretty huge mess to clean up with Christopher re-entering the picture, and it was…well, an exercise in futility of sorts. The show really didn’t get back on track until Chris was out of the picture, and this was only recently. In recent weeks it has been building up to Luke and Lorelai reuniting (Often with an incredibly obvious swing of the metaphor hammer, or the use of Dolly Parton songs), and Logan is asking to propose to Rory. Rosenthal built a season that, as it concludes, could have ended the show when we came to this point.

Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under Gilmore Girls, Television, The CW, Veronica Mars

Why NBC Might Extend ‘The Office’ to One Hour, and Why They Shouldn’t

The Office is NBC’s #1 Comedy in the key demos it craves so dearly. After an initial fairly mild success with its short first season, the show bounced back with a strong second season performance behind new arrival My Name is Earl. Although Earl began as the greater success, over time the two shows have changed positions; The Office has on occasion defeated Earl in both viewers and key demos. The show has benefited from numerous weeks of supersized episodes which feature complex storylines; these episodes continue this evening and until the show’s one-hour finale. And, there is rumour out of NBC that perhaps this might be a test of sorts. For, you see, NBC is considering stretching The Office into an hour-long comedy.

The hour long comedy is an interesting monster, and doesn’t really exist by today’s standards. Ugly Betty, Weeds and Desperate Housewives are perhaps classed as comedies according to awards standards, but all of them are highly dramatic at certain points in time. They each use their hour-long format to remain ostensibly a comedy (Housewives walks a fine, fine line in my book), but at the same time it just isn’t possible to have 42 minutes of straight comedy. And, while The Office has its more dramatic moments, it also has episodes that are very much small-scale comedic situations played out amongst the Office’s many characters. Why exactly is NBC taking this leap of faith of sorts, then, into uncharted territory? And, why is this reason not good enough, in my view, to justify this decision?

Point #1

NBC Needs a Success

Let’s face it: NBC has had a tough season. It’s at record lows in terms of key demo ratings, even with Heroes boosting Monday’s fortunes. It has critical hits, but colossal ratings failures, in Friday Night Lights and 30 Rock, and you might even through Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip and The Black Donnellys in there. These shows are all the doing of new head of TV Development Kevin Reilly. With only one success under his belt, he’s clearly under pressure to change the network’s fortunes. And, extending an existing success to an extra half hour is a way to get an extra boost in 18-49 within their lineup, which would take off some of the pressure Reilly and NBC President Jeff Zucker are feeling.

Counterpoint

The Danger of Milking

And, as we’ve learned in the past, the first reaction of any network in a time of struggle is to take their existing successes and make them more substantial within their lineup. It’s why we have Law & Order: Criminal Intent, it’s why Joey replaced Friends, and it’s why we had to live through a time when The Apprentice: Martha was on the air. And those were all great successes, right? My point is that I think this is a bad precedent to set in terms of dealing with your network’s lineup.

The success of The Office would likely translate well into an hour, but NBC can’t just try to turn to spinoffs and extensions and the like in their search for a new identity. It’s a dangerous example to set, and I think that starting with The Office would lead to a dangerous pattern of behaviour.

Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under NBC, Scrubs, The Office